1. theatlantic:

    Yep, Google Just Patented Background Noise

    In 2008, Google applied to patent a system that analyzes the environments surrounding mobile phones — temperature, humidity, sound — by way of sensors embedded in those phones. The technology would be mainly used, Google said in its filing, for (yes) “advertising based on environmental conditions.” It would provide another information layer, beyond quaint little GPS, that would target ads based not just on users’ immediate locations, but on their immediate environments. So, the filing noted, detections of hot weather could serve up ads for air conditioners; or, inversely, winter coats. Or the phone sensors might detect, say, the distinctive sounds of an orchestra being tuned, and combine that information — the user is at a concert — with location data and local events data to figure out which concert the user is attending. And then serve ads (for nearby restaurants, orchestral CDs, local violin teachers) based on that intel.

    Cool, no? And also totally creepy?

    Well. This week, Google was granted its patent. The firm has officially patented background noise. (And also: cold. And also: warmth.)

    There are huge privacy concerns here, obviously, one of them being that the ability to track devices’ background noises would seem to imply the ability to track all their noises. And “it is important to respect the privacy of users,” Google acknowledges in the patent, noting that monitor-tracking will be opt-out-able and that “a privacy policy” specifying which, and how, sensor-gathered information would be used “may be provided to the user.” One wonders about the legality of the hypothetical operation in the 12 states that require everyone recorded to consent to that recording. The sound the phone picks up may just be an advertising signal for an algorithm to Google, but the law could see it differently.

    These might be moot points, anyway. There’s no indication, as yet, that Google has plans to implement the “environmental condition” technology, GeekWire points out. But it bears repeating nonetheless, both as a whoa and as an insight into how the firm is thinking about the role it’ll play in our digital future: Google has patented background noise.

    And all for the purpose of serving you ads.

    [Image: A rendering of Google’s latest patent. Note the lines: “environmental condition” and “ad server.”]

  1. herwitheredsoul reblogged this from ilovecharts
  2. herdivineshadow reblogged this from nedhepburn
  3. its-onlygene reblogged this from ilovecharts
  4. decause reblogged this from ilovecharts
  5. adhdad reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    Holy crap.
  6. dascus reblogged this from theatlantic
  7. scoticus reblogged this from ilovecharts
  8. waterman12053 reblogged this from theatlantic
  9. tallpawl reblogged this from theatlantic
  10. diasporianprince reblogged this from theatlantic
  11. seemata reblogged this from ilovecharts
  12. ijustcameheretobounce reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
  13. hisnamewasbeanni reblogged this from gjmueller and added:
    Oh…sweet Jesus.
  14. appvisor reblogged this from theatlantic
  15. sliverdemon reblogged this from theatlantic
  16. fionaelle reblogged this from auragreen
  17. atomicyawn reblogged this from curiositycounts
  18. layyhere reblogged this from kittiejean
  19. minivation reblogged this from gjmueller
  20. wereweever reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    Yep, Google Just Patented Background Noise In 2008, Google applied to patent a system that analyzes the environments...
  21. heartthecloud reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
  22. ga2p reblogged this from logicianmagician
  23. mechagai reblogged this from heatdeathofauniverse and added:
  24. paradoxicalparadigms reblogged this from logicianmagician
  25. logicianmagician reblogged this from curiositycounts
  26. techimage reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    音によって最適な広告を配信するシステムの特許(by Google)
  27. claytonic67 reblogged this from theatlantic
  28. theluciusfox reblogged this from theatlantic
  29. darrough reblogged this from theatlantic and added:
    This is a little scary.
  30. contemptme reblogged this from theatlantic
  31. chamyl reblogged this from eschatologically
  32. mohawkdandy reblogged this from curiositycounts
  33. bobchik reblogged this from theatlantic